If only for my …

We all have things about ourselves that we don’t like. Some of these foibles of physicality or fumbles of character date back far into our memories. Take my ears. I have never fully embraced them. They are quite functional, to be sure, but unfortunately that functionality comes with a price: they stick out too much. What boy of the ’60s could like crew cuts when the only thing visible (to him) in the mirror each morning were ears the size of Dumbo the elephant’s? A boy such as that would try to brush what hair strands remained as far as water and effort could stretch them. When the rules of hair cuts were eventually his to make, he would let his hair grow, shaggy-dog style, so it would cover not only the sides of his head but much of the front as well. He would learn to hide his social blush, to tilt his face in such a way that his eyes – and the outside world’s view of his inside spirit – were just slightly averted, sheltered. He would feel exposed, revealed, if ever a barber’s scissors trimmed too much of the complete mop of scalp camouflage that the decades kindly gifted him.

At the age of sixty-one, I can now laugh at that boy – and at the man he became. What conceits I am so easily able to form and carry! Like bricks unnecessarily stuffed into my life’s backpack, I have burdened myself with my fair share of needless cares and distractions. While I have learned to forget my ears, my focus has shifted to other, more obvious limitations in my form, function, and social fit. My eyebrows, for example, resemble caterpillars just before they roll into chrysalides. And the way my eyes and brow judge others, well, that is anything but attractive. Why do they have to be so expressive? After this many years on the planet, shouldn’t I be better able to hide my thoughts and emotions from those around me?

Hmmm – no doubt you see my dilemma. I aspire to growth, as a person and a soul graced with human form. But the habits of selfness, the vanities and insecurities of experience in the form of conscious being, they are not to be under-estimated. Just when I begin to applaud myself for making some progress in life’s journey, the inner mirror, the awareness that knows me so well, is ready to reflect a bit too much honesty into any silent, self-congratulatory ceremony.

Am I able to ever know if and how I have changed?

A former college classmate called me yesterday to say hello. Despite the years that have passed since we last saw each other, I remember him as if he is unchanged: personable, insightful, relaxed, accepting. Our conversation reinforced that memory. He is as kind and inquisitive as ever; we continued a friendship as if it had never paused – which, despite the absence of formal communication, it perhaps did not. There was, however, a slight perturbation in the field of time, a nuance of acknowledgement that we both were undoubtedly different, at least in some small ways, from what we remembered of each other.

“Have you ever gone to reunions?” he asked.

I have not. In truth, I have sometimes found the concept of traveling long distances to regather with people from points A, B, and C in my life journey a daunting prospect. My excuses have always been real: family, work, and schedule priorities. Inside, however, I’ve worried that somehow I wouldn’t measure up, that reconvening with my past might remind me of how little I have really traveled as a person. Would I be exposed as still similar to that hesitant young man of forty years ago? Would I be snagged by the quicksand of comparison, the tendency to judge my own decades against the so-called career successes and personal triumphs of others? I feel different to my twenty-two year-old historical persona. But is that difference meaningful, is it substantive, or is it instead another example of the persistent selfishness of my spirit, the desire to be better, the egocentric fear that somehow my efforts to improve have been misplaced or, worse yet, unsuccessful?

“I went to an event last year,” my friend laughed. “It was fun! And you know what I learned: there are a lot of good people in our class. I talked to some classmates I hadn’t seen in years, or didn’t really know back then, and it was really nice to learn what good, decent people they were, they still are.”

Good. Decent. What a nice way to frame our life voyage! I cannot change things like my ears, my youthful (and perhaps persistent) insecurity, and the silly concerns of career, curriculum vitae, and measured contribution to the common cause. When time’s looking glass is held into view, I may be different, I may be same, I may be recognizable in some ways, I may need refocusing in others. Have I simply been a good person, a decent fellow traveler?

That question is never mine to answer. It may be yours. It may be the Creator’s. It may even be beside the point. For the point may be nothing more refined that this: my ears are to hear, not to see. The better I can listen, the more I can learn. And the more I can learn, well, the easier I can accept all parts of who I am, who you are, and who we might be together.

The true art of giving

We are alive during a time of large graft, small grift, and sometimes extravagant personal attention to gain. What’s in it for me? Why should you be the one to prosper? Life and our circumstances may feel unfair. We are easily tired. The corners of our principles have become susceptible to the wear and tear of media noise, political theatre, and unbridled vitriol, permitting our aspirations and better values to leak through the fragile folds of the container we sometimes call our character.

Friends, this is no time for fatigue. We cannot afford ourselves the luxury of assuming that our behaviors are isolated, that our actions have no consequences, that our inactions are without impact. How we live our lives, every day, makes a difference. What we stand for, in our thoughts, words, and deeds, has significance.

I recently had a conversation with a special soul who I’ll call Sol. “Are you a giving person?” Sol asked me.

Not wanting to respond with too much certainty, I hesitated, then answered yes.

“How do you know that?” Sol pressed gently.

“Well,” I shrugged, “I try to not to always focus on myself. I try to think of others … you know.”

Sol’s expression was not one of knowing. “When you give, is it with truthful intent?”

There are some conversations in life that quickly find depth, interactions where there is no repartee, the pace feels momentous, and memories somehow are formed before the dialogue has unfolded. Truthful intent? Well, I’d like to think that I did but I felt vulnerable to misrepresenting either myself or my actual experience. Nonplussed, I let the question sink. Sol simply waited.

“It’s hard to know truth, Sol,” I eventually responded. “Can anyone really know if their intent is pure?”

Answering a question with a question is a time-honored avoidance technique. Sol was having none of my misdirection. “So you don’t offer gifts with a pure sense of giving?”

Again, difficult words. Gifts. Pure. Offer. I was fairly convinced that I failed to meet such a standard. No, I knew that did not. My eyes pawed the ground like a dog not knowing where to dig.

Sol embraced my embarrassment. “Have you ever witnessed a real act of selflessness?”

Indeed! I was certain of it. Whether directly or through reports from others, people are able to offer miraculously to each other. Images raced to my mind: caregivers, fire fighters, health care workers, soldiers, saints, neighbors, parents, strangers spontaneously offering assistance – –

“Would you give your life for another?”

Perhaps another time I will describe my unusual questioner. Suffice it to save for now that Sol has the sort of soothing voice that insinuates itself effortlessly into one’s psyche. I responded quickly, affirmatively. Yes, I would do that. More scenarios flooded my senses, remembrances of times when I have proactively offered, through internal prayer, my own life as protection for another. Would I still willingly offer my breath, my place here, in this body, at this time, so that someone I love might continue in their own journey? Without a moment’s —

Sol’s voice: “Is such intention not pure?”

Perhaps. It feels simply right. Complete. Decision-free. And yet, despite the prior offers, I am still here. An intention is not an action. The willingness to release from attachment in order to benefit someone I love could be a greater type of attachment.

Sol dismissed such circularity with an eyebrow. “Love, freely offered, is neither attachment nor excuse.”

You might imagine my confusion. A person buoyed by moments of beauty, someone also saddened by his own inconsistency in embodying simplicity and kindness, I struggle to settle myself in our modern universe. Externally, I am skeptical of many human motives, including my own. Internally, I am inspired by a myriad of human actions.

My conversation with Sol had found itself far afield from where it had actually begun. It was not Sol, in fact, who had asked the first question. “Why won’t people wear masks during the current surge in the pandemic?” I had originally wondered. “Why aren’t people able to see that a simple face mask is an expression of caring? If everyone were to wear face masks in the weeks ahead, if we all were to make decisions over the U.S. Thanksgiving holiday from the vantage of caring for others, we would save many lives. Why can’t we help everyone understand that — “

“The art of giving takes practice,” Sol interrupted. “True giving is not linked with assurance of outcome.”

Filtered through a multi-colored mask, these words seemed almost spoken by Sol’s eyes. It was where our initial conversation ended. Since then, I have wondered at the implications of giving without attachment to outcome. I tried the following theory with a family member: suppose you knew that the mask you wore today could interrupt a unique infectious transmission chain that results – two or three people in the future – in a death of a stranger. Suppose you could see, into the future, the identity of that person. Would you wear the mask today to prevent that person’s death? I would. I bet you would too. Suppose the mask that someone next to you in a grocery store wears could interrupt its own unique transmission chain that results – a different two or three people in the future – in the death of someone you know. Would you plead with that person in the grocery store to keep that mask covering their mouth and nose until they reach their car? Those are real outcomes. The gift from the mask is measurable.

“Are you a giving person?” Sol’s question rings in my ears. It challenges me to release my upset with those who do not wear face masks. It is not my role to judge. Nor is it my role to critique. My place is only to give, and to do so with the right intent. Is it truthful? I cannot say. Will it make a difference? Usually. Occasionally. Always. Never. The answer should not matter. My life neither begins nor ends with me. We are inextricably intertwined.

May exploration into the true art of giving help us restore the tattered corners of our collective character.